English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Chest pain accounts for 8% of local Emergency Department (ED) presentations. Patient experience time (PET) is the entire time each patient spends in ED and the national ED PET goal is 6 - 9 hours. The Cardiology Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) consult service reduced PET for patients with chest pain from 17 hours, however the average PET for patients presenting with chest pain remains high at 10 hours in 2019. Aim To assess the impact on of ANP Cardiology autonomy on the PET of chest pain patients who present to a busy ED. Method Building on 6 years of ANP chest pain consultations in the ED, cardiology ANPs expanded their caseload to fully manage chest pain patients directly from the waiting room as named clinicians, instead of an ED doctor.  The ANP managed the patient completely from triage to diagnosis, resulting in discharge or admission. Enablers included ANP referral for ionising radiation and medicinal prescribing, with buy in from ED Consultants and Cardiology clinical lead. All patients managed directly by the ANP from 2017-2019 were included in the data analysis. The ED symphony system was used as a clinical and audit tool. ANP chest pain PET was compared to ED Doctor chest pain PET. This service evaluation was approved by the hospital audit committee.  Results 197 patients who presented with chest pain were autonomously managed by one ANP as a named clinician over 3 years. Sixty-four percent were managed completely autonomously.  Eighty per cent were discharged from ED. ANP decision time from initial assessment to admit or discharge was 2.6 hours. The ANP average chest pain PET time was 7.5 hours compared to average ED doctor chest pain PET of 9.5 hours. Conclusions As social distancing now impacts more than ever on usual ED pressures, caseload expansion by the Cardiology ANPs evidences further PET reductions for patients who present with chest pain in line with targets. As only one ANP is on the floor and not every shift, many hours of the PET occurred in the ED prior to the ANP ‘clicking’ on as a named clinician. Professional courage to completely manage this potentially high risk cohort autonomously has been welcomed patients and ED staff. PET of the chest pain patient has the potential to reduce further with more ANPs proficient in chest pain assessment within the emergency department setting.

Emergency Department chest pain patient experience time (PET): the impact of ANP cardiology autonomy from triage to diagnosis