English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Aims Left ventricular function recovery (LV-REC) or left ventricular adverse remodelling (LV-REM) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) play an important role for identifying patients at risk of heart failure. In this study we aim to evaluate the usefulness of non-invasive myocardial work (MW), a new index of global and regional myocardial performance, to predict LV-REC or LV-REM after AMI. Methods and results Fifty patients with AMI (mean age, 63.8 ± 13.4 years), treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were prospectively enrolled. They underwent a baseline transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) within 48 h after PCI and a second TTE after a median of 31 days during the follow-up. MW was derived from the strain-pressure loops, integrating in its calculation the non-invasive arterial pressure, according to standard speckle tracking echocardiography recommendations. LV-REC was defined as an absolute improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 5% from LVEF at baseline, whereas LV-REM was defined as an increase of ≥ 20% of the LV end diastolic volume (LVEDV) at 1 month follow-up. We overall found a significant improvement from baseline to one-month follow-up for values of LVEF (49.8 ± 9.5% vs. 52.8 ± 9.3%, P = 0.001), global longitudinal strain (GLS) (−13.4 ± 3.9% vs. −18.7 ± 5.4%, P = 0.016), global work index (GWI) (1368.6 ± 435.2 vs. 1788 ± 493 mmHg/%, P = 0.0001), global work efficiency (GWE) (89.96 ± 9.3% vs. 91.3 ± 6.4%, P = 0.001), global constructive work (GCW) (1619.16 ± 497.9 mmHg/% vs. 2008.6 ± 535.3 mmHg/%, P = 0.0001), global wasted work (GWW) (188.8 ± 19.8 mmHg/% vs. 149.2 ± 16.5 mmHg/%). However, LV-REC at 1 month of follow-up was observed only in 36% of the population enrolled, whereas LV-REM was described in 18% of cases. Using ROC curve analysis, we identified a cut off value of 202 mmHg/% for baseline GWW (sensitivity 75%, specificity 62%, AUC 0.6667, CI 95%: 0.51618–0.81715, P = 0.0001) to identify patients with LV-REM at 1 month. With regards to conventional echo parameters, patients with LV-REC showed lower baseline wall motion score index (WMSI) than those without LV-REC (1.73 vs. 1.38, P = 0.007). Conclusions Among standard and advanced TTE parameters, only baseline GWW is able to predict early LV-REM at 1 month after primary PCI. Therefore, it could be used during baseline evaluation of AMI patients for a more accurate stratification of those at higher risk of heart failure. However, further larger scale studies are needed to validate these findings.

709 Non-invasive assessment of myocardial work: an useful tool for predicting LV remodelling after myocardial infarction?