English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Case report A 56-year-old man affected by micromolecular multiple myeloma was treated by several cycles of different chemotherapy drugs from September 2015 to December 2020. The chemotherapy regimen included 4-cycle first-line therapy with Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone; 19-cycle second-line therapy with Carfilzomib, Revlimid, and Dexamethasone; 8-cycle third-line therapy with Daratumumab, Revlimid, and Dexamethasone; finally, he was started on therapy with Pomalidomide and Endoxan. During the various treatments, the patient did not follow a dedicated cardiological follow-up programme. In November 2020, he was hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit for acute pulmonary oedema and subsequently discharged with a diagnosis of mild left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF 50%). One month later, due to the worsening of dyspnoea, the patient was finally referred to our Cardioncology Unit for the medical assessment. The echocardiographic examination revealed a global and severe left ventricular dysfunction (FE 40%) with significant reduction in left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS −10%). For these reasons, we referred the patient to coronary angiography. Conclusions This case report wants to underline how important a dedicated cardiological follow-up is in patients undergoing chemotherapy drugs, especially if used at high doses and for many cycles.

682 Cardioncology: is it time to spread the need for dedicated management?