English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

International guidelines recommend using risk score tools that allow us to assess the risk of bleeding and ischemia when deciding on DAPT. In our research, we aimed to examine the mortality relationship of new risk scores, DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores. Method Between 2013–2014, 948 patients admitted to our clinic with ACS were included in our study. We excluded 688 patient (no contact number,CABG, medical treatment, use of oral anticoagulation, active malignant cancer). 260 patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (58%, 8 STEMI, 35%, 4 non-STEMI, 5%, 4 Unstable angina pectoris) who undergo coronary stent implantation were included in the study. We aimed to focus on the patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and their risk of mortality. The patients' records were retrospectively analyzed through the hospital information system and archive records. Laboratory results, echocardiography and CAG reports of the patients, disease histories were obtained from the information recorded through the system. With these data, PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT scores of patients were calculated. Results The number of patients with a PRECISE-DAPT Score ≥25 was 62 (23.8%). The number of patients with DAPT Score ≥2 was 193 (74.2%). Mortality occurred in 49 (18.8%) patients. Patients with PRECISE-DAPT ≥25 and those with PRECISE-DAPT &amp;lt;25 were compared in terms of mortality and mortality was significantly higher in the high-scoring group [P &amp;lt;0.001 OR 6.94 C (3.53–13.62)]. The patients were divided into 4 groups (PRECISE-DAPT 25 and DAPT ≥2, PRECISE-DAPT ≥25 and DAPT ≥2, PRECISE-DAPT 25 and DAPT 2, PRECISE-DAPT ≥25 and DAPT 2) according to PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT score. Mortality was significantly higher regardless of DAPT score in patients with high PRECISE-DAPT scores (p&amp;lt;0.001). We evaluated the relationship between PRECISE-DAPT score and major bleeding and all bleeding. Compared to the group there was no significant difference in all bleeding events (P=0.56) and major bleeding events (P=0.23). The relationship between bleeding events and mortality was evaluated. There was no significant difference in mortality (p=0.689) with all bleeding events; but mortality was significantly increased in patients with major bleeding [P=0.025 OR 6.16 (1,33–28,49)]. Conclusion In our study, we observed that the patient group with a high PRECISE-DAPT score had a high mortality rate regardless of the DAPT score. The PRECISE-DAPT score is a useful tool in determining the group with high long-term mortality in patients who present with acute coronary syndrome and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. The clinician should use the PRECISE-DAPT score when deciding on the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in this patient group and these patients with high scores need to be monitored more closely. The data we have obtained from our study is retrospective and these results need to be supported by prospective and large studies. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Relationship of PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT scores with mortality in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome who undergo coronary stent implantation