English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The Danish philosopher of law Alf Ross established a theory of legal doctrine with the intention of bringing legal doctrine into line with logical positivism. Ross was aware of the fact that propositions of legal doctrine (as of social science in general) might influence the 'object' of the doctrine, for instance they could influence judicial decision-making. Such influence could be considered fundamental for a theory of legal doctrine. Although Ross considered words which create their object and therefore their own truth to be magic, he did not or could not recommend that legal doctrine refrain from such influence. In this way Ross faced an element of legal doctrine that was incompatible with his positivistic theory.

Legal Doctrine between Empirical and Rhetorical Truth. A Critical Analysis of Alf Ross' Conception of Legal Doctrine