English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background Central venous saturation and central venous pressure can be determined with central venous catheters. Therefore, the tip of the catheter should be located in the superior vena cava. The location can be monitored by electrocardiography or X-ray. The central venous pressure curve is displayed on the monitor. The reference value of central venous saturation is &amp;gt;70%. Venous pO2 is normally 35–45 mmHg and central venous pressure 1–9 mmHg. Case summary We treated a 22-year-old patient with septic shock. Central venous saturation was 100% with a pO2 of 198 mmHg. The arterial blood gas analysis was comparatively low with saturation of 98% and pO2 of 111 mmHg. On chest X-ray, the central venous catheter tip appeared on the left side of the heart. On echocardiography, aortic positioning was not evident. On the monitor, a ‘venous pressure-like’ curve was seen, that did not stand in exact correlation to the electrocardiogram curve. The computed tomography (CT) image showed placement of the catheter in the upper left pulmonary vein. The patient had a partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. Discussion The C-wave of the central venous pressure curve normally occurs after the R-wave of the electrocardiogram. If C-waves appeared before R-waves, the central venous catheter placement is not central venous and must be checked. In our case, the apparent ‘venous’ pO2 in blood gas examination was higher than arterial pO2. The catheter position had to be in an oxygenated vessel proximal to the left ventricle. A vascular anomaly was a possible diagnosis and was confirmed on CT imaging.

A case report: a 22-year-old septic patient with central venous pO2 of 198 mmHg