English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited condition, with approximately 60% of patients carrying a possibly disease-causing genetic variant. Known desmosomal genes account for about 50% of those variants. We herein report a family with ARVC in which a pathogenic desmosomal variant was missed because of the initial genetic testing method. Case summary A 54-year-old man diagnosed with ARVC underwent genetic cascade screening for a heterozygous titin variant (TTN: c.26542C&amp;gt;T), detected in his phenotypically affected sister. He did not harbour this TTN variant. Moreover, reclassification of this variant based on the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) 2015 criteria showed it to be likely benign. Upon genetic re-screening with a dedicated cardiomyopathy panel a heterozygous missense variant in desmoglein-2 (DSG2: c.152G&amp;gt;C) was found. His sister’s DNA was re-analysed and the same DSG2 variant was detected, and classified as LP (likely pathogenic) by current literature. Discussion The initial genetic screening tool used in the patient’s sister (whole-exome sequencing, WES) failed to detect the likely causative desmosomal variant in our family. While WES represents a good tool in searching for novel genes in Trio Analysis, it has a low DNA coverage in important regions (mean 10×) of known ARVC-associated genes. We therefore propose using smaller panels with better coverage in the clinical setting, such as Trusight-cardio (mean DNA coverage 100–300×) as an initial genetic screening method.

european heart journal. case reports

Clinical impact of low coverage in whole-exome genetic testing in the assessment of familial arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a case report