English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background/Introduction: There is an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in endurance athletes. We sought to evaluate the likely mechanistic basis for this phenomenon. Methods 36 endurance athletes in sinus rhythm, with a previous history of AF (ATH-AF) were compared to age and gender matched endurance athletes with no prior history of AF (ATH), non athletes with paroxysmal AF (NONATH-AF) and age and gender matched healthy controls (CONTROL). A detailed transthoracic echocardiogram was performed with all groups in sinus rhythm, with detailed left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) measurements, including strain analysis. Results All athletes had increased LA and LV size when compared with healthy controls (Table 1). Non athletes with paroxysmal AF had increased LA size when compared with controls. However, indexed LA/LV ratio was preserved in athletes and similar to healthy individuals, whilst AF patients had significantly increased LA/LV ratio. Athletes with AF had higher e’ velocity and lower E/e’, whereas e’ was reduced and E/e’ elevated in non-athlete AF patients. Athletes had impaired LA reservoir and contractile strain, and reduced LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) compared with healthy controls. Conclusions Compared to healthy controls, athletes have reduced LA and LV strain, with preserved LV diastolic function and LA/LV ratio. In contrast, altered diastolic function with differential increase in LA volume was observed in AF patients. The increased risk of AF in athletes is likely mediated by different mechanistic processes other than an atrial myopathy consequent to diastolic dysfunction as observed in non-athletes with AF. Table 1. LA and LV parameters Parameter ATH-AF ATH NONATH-AF CONTROL P value LVEDV indexed (ml/m2) 84 ± 12 79 ± 14 57 ± 10 51 ± 13 &amp;lt;0.001 LVESV indexed (ml/m2) 35 ± 6 34 ± 7 25 ± 8 27 ± 33 0.02 LV ejection fraction (%) 58 ± 4 56 ± 4 56 ± 10 58 ± 8 0.586 LV global longitudinal strain (%) 19.2 ± 1.7 18.9 ± 2.1 21 ± 3.1 21.7 ± 2.9 &amp;lt;0.001 e’ vel (cm/s) 10 ± 2 10 ± 3 8 ± 2 9 ± 2 0.007 E/e’ 5.7 ± 1.3 5.9 ± 1.8 9.1 ± 3.3 7.5 ± 1.5 &amp;lt;0.001 LAV max indexed (ml/m2) 45 ± 11 43 ± 12 38 ± 11 27 ± 8 &amp;lt;0.001 Indexed LAV/LVEDV ratio 0.5 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.1 &amp;lt;0.001 LA reservoir strain (%) 27.2 ± 4.8 28.2 ± 3.7 27.9 ± 8.4 33.2 ± 7.0 &amp;lt;0.001 LA conduit strain (%) 14.2 ± 4.5 14.4 ± 4.0 14.9 ± 5.5 16.6 ± 6.3 0.182 LA contractile strain (%) 13.0 ± 3.1 13.8 ± 3.6 13.0 ± 5.1 16.6 ± 3.1 &amp;lt;0.001 LV = left ventricular, LAV = left atrial volume, LA = left atrial

european heart journal. cardiovascular imaging

P970 Significant differences in atrial structural and functional parameters leading to differing mechanisms of atrial fibrillation in athletes compared to non-athletes