English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Funding Acknowledgements None Background Cardiac Power Index (CPI) is an integrative hemodynamic measure of cardiac pumping capability and is the product of the simultaneously measured mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO). In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), MAP is not reflective of mean systolic left ventricular (LV) pressure due to the transvalvular gradient. Non-invasive assessment of mean systolic LV pressure is challenging in severe aortic stenosis. CPI assessed using systemic MAP was previously shown to predict survival post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Purpose We evaluated the utility of a gradient adjusted CPI in predicting survival post TAVR compared to CPI alone Methods A retrospective study was performed including patients undergoing TAVR with 1 year follow-up. Baseline demographics, clinical, and echocardiographic data were abstracted from a cohort of 1,011 patients. CPI was calculated, (CO x MAP)/ (451 x BSA) Watts/m2. Gradient adjusted CPI was calculated using an augmented MAP i) adding aortic valve mean gradient(AVMG) to systolic blood pressure (CPI1); ii) adding aortic valve maximal instantaneous gradient to systolic blood pressure (CPI2) and iii) adding AVMG to MAP (CPI3). Patient survival score was calculated using a step up technique to identify the cut off value for CPI and gradient adjusted CPI to identify, where the maximum difference in mortality occurred. Multivariate cox-regression analysis was performed to adjust for baseline covariates. Receiver operator curves(ROC) for CPI and gradient adjusted CPI were calculated to predict survival post TAVR. Results The mortality rate at 1 yr was 16%. Mean age and AVMG of survivors was 81 +/- 9 yrs and 43 +/-14 mmHg vs 80 +/-9 yrs and 42 +/- 13 mmHg in the deceased group. Proportion of female patients was similar in both groups (p = 0.7). Patients in the deceased group at baseline had a higher prevalence of chronic lung disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure within 2-weeks of procedure, higher STS-PROM score, lower serum albumin level, higher prevalence of moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, higher right ventricular systolic pressure and higher prevalence of dialysis. Both CPI and gradient adjusted CPI were independently associated with survival at 1 year. The area under ROC for CP, CP1, CP2 and CP3 were 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 - 0.72), 0.65 (95% CI 0.60 – 0.70), 0.66 (95% CI 0.61 – 0.71) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 – 0.68) respectively. Conclusion Gradient adjusted CPI did not improve accuracy of predicting post TAVR survival at 1 year compared to CPI alone. Abstract P339 Figure. Area under ROC

european heart journal. cardiovascular imaging

P339 Gradient adjusted cardiac power index does not improve prediction of survival post transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to cardiac power index alone