English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.John 20:24–29After coronary angioplasty, the arteries heal by a series of complex and dynamic mechanisms, which aim to restore vessel architecture and ensure laminar flow. With stent implantation, foreign material is introduced: an additional variable that significantly disturbs the healing process. Ideally, the stent struts should be covered by a perfectly functioning neo-endothelium, but this is not always the case. At different stages, peri-strut components induce inflammation with cell infiltration, fibrin, and clot formation. Patient and plaque factors play a role in healing, but we know from early-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) with permanent polymer (PP) that stent factors are crucial. The absence of strut coverage and increased fibrin formation were shown to be pathological correlates of delayed arterial healing in early-generation DES. Chronic inflammation, eosinophilic infiltrates suggesting a hypersensitivity reaction, strut malapposition, bifurcation stenting, or strut penetration of a necrotic core are other mechanisms of delayed arterial healing, precipitating stent thrombosis (ST).1,2 In particular, the …

Coronary healing after stenting: wounds, faith, and the quest for the perfect stent