English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background. A consistent proportion of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) experience left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) during the first 24 months of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). However, important decisions, such as the need for ICD, are requested after 3 months of GDMT. The evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during the first years after GDMT in DCM is unknown. Purpose. Our study aims to investigate the proportion and characterise DCM patients experiencing late LVEF improvement. Methods. We analysed DCM patients consecutively enrolled with short disease duration, recent initiation of GDMT (≤ 3 months) and a LVEF ≤ 35% at 6-month follow-up evaluation. LVEF &amp;gt; 35% at 24-month was the primary end-point of the study. Results. Among 131 patients (mean age 53 ± 14, male sex 74%), 88 (67%) improved their LVEF at 24 months above 35%. A &amp;gt; 10% reduction of the indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDDi) between enrolment and 6-month evaluation emerged as the only independent predictor of late LVEF improvement. During the subsequent follow-up, the late LVEF improvement was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of major arrhythmic events, compared to patients with persistent LVEF ≤ 35% (p = 0.010).  Conclusions. A high proportion of DCM patients improve their LVEF after more than 3-6 months of GDMT, which is associated with lower long-term arrhythmic risk. The early evaluation of dynamic parameters, such as the reduction of LVEDDi could help to identify those patients. Baseline population characteristics Total (131) LVEF &amp;gt; 35% at 24 months (88) LVEF ≤ 35% at 24 months (43) p Age (years) 53 ± 14 52 ± 14 54 ± 14 0.52 LVEF (%) 28.4 ± 5.6 29.2 ± 5.3 26.7 ± 5.8 0.02 LVEDDi (mm/m2) 34.9 ± 4.6 34.1 ± 4.7 36.5 ± 4.1 0.01 LVEDVi (ml/m2) 89.4 ± 34.2 83.7 ± 28.5 101.0 ± 41.5 0.01 RV dysfunction normalisation or persistence of normal RV function* 92 (84.4) 59 (84.3) 33 (84.6) 0.96 RFP disappearance* 115 (93.5) 80 (95.2) 35 (89.7) 0.25 MR improvement or persistence of mild/absent MR* 91 (72.2) 66 (78.6) 25 (59.5) 0.02 LVEF improvement* 30 (22.9) 21 (23.9) 9 (20.9) 0.7 LVEDDi reduction* 28 (23.7) 25 (32.1) 3 (7.5) 0.003 Values are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD. *Dynamic parameters are evaluated as change from enrollment to the 6-months evaluation. LVEDDi left ventricular end-diastolic diameter indexed; LVEDVi: left ventricular end diastolic volume indexed; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MR: mitral regurgitation; RFP: restrictive filling pattern; RV: right ventricular. Abstract Figure. Major outcome

european heart journal. cardiovascular imaging

Late improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with persistent severe systolic dysfunction under guideline-directed medical therapy