English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Myocardial bridging (MB) is associated with endothelial dysfunction and may represent a cause of angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD). Purpose  Herein, we assessed the interplay between MB and coronary vasomotor disorders, evaluating also their prognostic relevance in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) or stable NOCAD. Methods We prospectively enrolled consecutive NOCAD patients undergoing intracoronary acetylcholine provocative test to assess the presence of epicardial or microvascular spasm in patients with suspected angina or MINOCA. Myocardial bridging was diagnosed by coronary angiography. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI and rehospitalisation for unstable angina, was assessed at follow-up. We also assessed angina status using Seattle Angina Questionnaires (SAQ). Results We enrolled 310 patients (mean age 60.6 ± 11.9; 136 [43.9%] men; 169 [54.5%] stable NOCAD and 141 [45.5%] MINOCA). MB was found in 53 (17.1%) patients. MB was an independent predictor of spasm and MINOCA (p &amp;lt; 0.05). At follow-up (median 22 months, interquartile range [13-32]), patients with MB had a higher rate of MACE and a lower SAQ score (all p &amp;lt; 0.001) compared with patients without MB. The rate of MACE was considerably higher in patients with both spasm and MB than in the remaining patients (12/42 [28.6%] vs. 13/268 [4.8%], p &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusion Among patients with NOCAD coronary spasm associated with MB predicts a worse clinical presentation with MINOCA and a worse clinical outcome at medium-long term follow-up, thus identifying a high-risk subset of patients with MB with relevant therapeutic implications. MB and clinical outcomesCharacteristicsOverall population(n= 310)Presence of Myocardial bridging(n= 53)Absence of Myocardial bridging(n = 257)p valueMACE [n, (%)]25 (8.1)12 (22.6)13 (5.1)&amp;lt;0.001CV Death [n, (%)]1 (0.3)0 (0.0)1 (0.4)0.649MI occurrence [n, (%)]6 (1.9)2 (3.8)4 (1.6)0.286Hospitalization for unstable angina [n, (%)]18 (5.8)10 (18.9)8 (3.1)&amp;lt; 0.001Recurrent angina [n, (%)]70 (22.6)20 (37.7)50 (19.4)0.004SAQ [median (IQR)]82 [78; 88]78 [68; 84]84 [78; 88]&amp;lt; 0.001Follow-up time [months, median (IQR)]22 [15;32]20 [15; 28]23 [15; 34]0.10CV Cardiovascular; MI: Myocardial Infarction; IQR: InterQuartile Range; MACE: Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; SAQ: Seattle Angina Questionnaire.Abstract Figure Outcomes

european heart journal. acute cardiovascular care

The interplay between myocardial bridging and coronary spasm in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: pathogenic and prognostic implications