English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background According to current guidelines, most paediatric patients in Europe diagnosed with Crohn′s disease (CD) are prescribed long-term immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine (AZA). This study aimed to develop a predictive model allowing to stratify patients who will not benefit from AZA maintenance treatment and who require a more intensive therapeutic approach early after diagnosis. Methods The study was designed to develop a clinical prediction rule using retrospective data analysis from patients included to prospective inception cohort, the EUROKIDS-IBD until 2017. In total, 1190 CD patients using AZA were selected from the registry in 13 European centres. Of these, 441 patients who responded to induction treatment, started AZA treatment within 6 weeks from the time of diagnosis and maintained remission at week 12 were entered into this multicentre study. The primary outcome was time to clinical relapse defined as a necessity of re-induction of remission. A sequence of Cox models was fitted to predict the risk of relapse. Variables appearing to be significant in univariate risk analyses were added to the model one by one and non-significant terms were dropped. Results More than 50 % of patients did not experience a clinical relapse within 2 years of AZA treatment (Figure 1). The median time to relapse was 2.11 (CI 1.59–2.46) years. Out of all tested parameters available at the time of diagnosis,8 were predictive in the context of early relapse. Only 4 of these variables, namely centre (p = 0.0009), age (HR = 1.389 95% CI (1.004–1.921), p = 0.047), CRP (HR = 1.504 95% CI (1.116–2.027), p = 0.008) and BMI Z-score (HR = 0.830 95% CI (0.742–0.928), p = 0.001), remained significant in multivariate analyses. Conclusion In paediatric CD patients achieving clinical remission after induction treatment at week 12, AZA was effective as maintenance treatment in over 50% of patients for 2 years. Due to low values of HR, the possibility to predict relapse on AZA treatment appears to be limited. Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the Grant Agency of Charles University in Prague [grant number 364617] and by Ministry of Health, Czech Republic-conceptual development of research organisation, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic [00064203].

journal of crohn's and colitis

P365 Identification of predictive factors of AZA/6-MP treatment outcome in paediatric luminal Crohn’s disease: a multicentre study of the paediatric IBD Porto group of ESPGHAN