English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This study examines basic number processing (subitizing, automaticity, and magnituderepresentation) as the possible underpinning of mathematical difficulties often evidencedin deaf adults. Hearing and deaf participants completed tasks to assess the automaticitywith which magnitude information was activated and retrieved from long-term memory (usinga Stroop-like paradigm to assess congruity effects), the representational format ofmagnitude information (by analysis of distance and Spatial Numerical Association ofResponse Codes effects), and the ability to rapidly enumerate small sets (subitizing).Both groups showed distance effects taken to indicate the use of a visual–spatial analognumber line representing approximate quantity. Furthermore, both groups showed similarpatterns of performance on the subitizing tasks and showed similar amounts of interferencein an analysis of congruity effects. This is taken as evidence against the notion thatidiosyncratic differences in basic number processing account for mathematical difficultiesexperienced by deaf individuals.

Subitizing, Magnitude Representation, and Magnitude Retrieval in Deaf and Hearing Adults