English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Toxicologists, clinical chemists, pathologists, and other laboratorians increasingly are drawn into litigation through work-related issues such as medical malpractice, workplace drug testing results, or postaccident Emergency Department testing or through consulting. In many cases, laboratorians become involved because expert or opinion testimony is required to assist the trier of fact (e.g., a jury in a jury trial or a judge in a bench trial) in understanding evidence such as serum alcohol concentrations, cardiac isoenzymes, or surgical pathology reports. Although the expert witness commonly is thought of as an individual with an advanced degree such as a PhD and/or MD, experts may be qualified for any number of reasons, including experience; even individuals who think they may be called to testify only to facts, such as the performance of a test, should consider the possibility of being called as expert witnesses.Dr. Froede, who is a veteran of many years in the field of forensic medicine, takes the reader from the most basic involvement in …

The Scientific Expert in Court. Principles and Guidelines. Richard M. Froede. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 1997, 92 pp. $19.00. ISBN 0-915274-93-0.