English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A new turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay for digoxin (Tina-quant [a] Digoxin, Boehringer Mannheim) was evaluated in seven laboratories. It can be performed without sample pretreatment with ready-to-use reagents on nondedicated analyzers in combination with routine clinical chemistry. The studies revealed a good analytical performance: lower limit of detection 0.12 microg/L (3 SD from mean of blank); linearity up to 7.5 microg/L; median between-run CVs 8.1% (0.6 microg/L), 2.8% (1.5 microg/L), 1.9% (3 microg/L); mean analytical recovery in control sera 98-102%; slopes from 0.97 to 1.09 and intercepts from -0.28 to 0.10 microg/L in comparison with four immunoassays; and a high resistance to common interferents. The test was more resistant to digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF) interference than other methods, showing cross-reactivity only in some intensive care patient samples. Among 192 patients in whom DLIF is expected (e.g., pregnant women, patients with renal failure, newborns), 90% of results were < or =0.26 microg/L digoxin. Cortisol showed no cross-reactivity and digoxigenin had a low reactivity. An interlaboratory survey revealed a good comparability of the Tina-quant [a] test with the median of all methods (slope 0.99, intercept -0.06 microg/L). An HPLC method for digoxin based on isocratic separation of samples on an RP-18 column followed by detection by an immunoassay yielded a reasonable comparability with the immunochemical tests with noncritical samples. Divergent results of immunoassays caused by DLIFs or different cross-reactivities with digoxin metabolites or derivatives can be explained by the use of this HPLC method.

Comparability of a new turbidimetric digoxin test with other immunochemical tests and with HPLC—a multicenter evaluation