English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We revisit the results of Harvie (2000) and show how correcting for areporting mistake in some of the estimated parameter values leads tosignificantly different conclusions, including realistic parameter values forthe Philips curve and estimated equilibrium employment rates exhibiting onaverage one tenth of the relative error of those obtained in Harvie (2000).

A comment on 'Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries'