English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the 21st century, the constitutional and political stability that Thailand has sought seems to be harshly convulsed by the occurrence of ‘colour-coded politics’ between the Red and Yellow factions from 2006. The conflict between the two factions resulted in two military coups in 2006 and 2014, which, in turn, led to the revocation of two permanent constitutions (those of 1997 and 2007) and the enactment of two new ones (those of 2007 and 2017) as well as the promulgation of two interim constitutions (those of 2006 and 2014). In this article, we will examine the constitution-making process in 21st-century Thailand based, in particular, on its two contesting sources of legitimization—that is, the conflict between global ideas of constitutionalism and its local alternative: Thai-ness.

Constitution-Making in 21st-Century Thailand:The Continuing Search for a Perfect Constitutional Fit