English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

The aim of this study is to evaluate how extensive retention indices (RIs) can be identifying an essential oil component within a single laboratory. The essential oils of  Matricaria chamomilla  L,  Tagetes lucida  Cav., and  Artemisia roxburghiana  Wall. are investigated with different columns and under different analytical conditions. These oils are analyzed with a GC unit and columns coated with the same stationary phases (polysiloxane OV-1 and polyethylene glycol CW-20M) but different characteristics (producer and inner diameter) under different analytical conditions (temperature program and mobile phase conditions). The great number of data obtained are used to determine what parameters other than stationary phase influence RI reliability, the range of variation of RIs with different columns or under different operating conditions, and the validity of D-RI measurements.

Reliability of Van den Dool Retention Indices in the Analysis of Essential Oils