English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

To the extent that our experiences of tastes and odors have underlying dimensions, one can mount a strong case that the expression of those dimensions is via hedonics. The hedonic dimension is crucial in defining responses in the chemical senses in a way that is not true for other senses, in that all chemosensory stimuli are intrinsically valenced, either at birth (e.g., in the case of sweetness and bitterness) or as a result of our subsequent experiences with them (arguably the case for all odor qualities). Traditional psychophysics, developed primarily for studies in vision, audition or touch, asks questions about stimulus intensity, but this may be of less importance for taste or smell, which derive much of their meaning from their hedonic properties. Moreover, certainly in the case of taste qualities, our hedonic responses may provide crucial clues regarding the adaptive significance of those qualities

Rating a New Hedonic Scale: A Commentary on “Derivation and Evaluation of a Labeled Hedonic Scale” by Lim, Wood and Green