Understanding Implementation and Improving Nutrition Interventions: Barriers and Facilitators of Using Data Strategically to Inform the Implementation of Maternal Nutrition in Uttar Pradesh, India
Author(s) -
Melissa Young,
Ahad Bootwala,
Shivani Kachwaha,
Rasmi Avula,
Sebanti Ghosh,
Praveen Kumar Sharma,
Vishal Dev Shastri,
Thomas Forissier,
Purnima Me,
Phuong Hong Nguyen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
current developments in nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 2475-2991
DOI - 10.1093/cdn/nzab081
Subject(s) - data collection , psychological intervention , medicine , qualitative property , uttar pradesh , government (linguistics) , accountability , nursing , medical education , environmental health , political science , socioeconomics , computer science , mathematics , sociology , philosophy , statistics , machine learning , law , linguistics
Background In response to the high levels of maternal nutrition in Uttar Pradesh, Alive & Thrive (A&T) aimed to strengthen the delivery of nutrition interventions through the government antenatal care platform, including leveraging ongoing data collection to improve program delivery and reach (registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03378141). However, we have a limited understanding of providers’ experiences and challenges in collecting and using data for decision making. Objective The aim was to identify barriers and facilitators to the 1 ) collection of data and 2 ) use of data for decision making. Methods In-depth interviews ( n = 35) were conducted among block-level government staff, frontline worker (FLW) supervisors, and A&T staff in 2 districts in Uttar Pradesh. Systematic coding of verbatim transcripts and detailed summaries were undertaken to elucidate themes related to data collection and use. FLW supervisors ( n = 103) were surveyed to assess data use experiences. Results Data were used to understand the reach of maternal nutrition services, estimate the demand for supplements, and guide identification of areas of low FLW performance. About half of supervisors reported using data to identify areas of improvement; however, only 23% reported using data to inform decision making. Facilitators of data collection and use included collaboration between health department officials, perceived importance of block ranking, and monthly review meetings with staff and supervisors to review and discuss data. Barriers to data collection and use included human resource gaps, inadequate technology infrastructure, FLW educational level, political structure, and lack of cooperation between FLWs and supervisors. Conclusions The use of data for decision making is critical for supporting intervention planning and providing targeted supervision and support for FLWs. Despite intensive data-collection efforts, the use of data to inform decision making remains limited. Collaboration facilitated data collection and use, but structural barriers such as staff vacancies need to be addressed to improve the implementation of maternal nutrition interventions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom