English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim The aim of the study is to evaluate the closure of the defect in postoperative pain, seroma and recurrence. Material and Methods Inclusion criteria were; defect width of 2 - 4 cm and body mass index ≤ 35 kg / m2, or previous intraperitoneal surgery. A prospective database of perioperative variables have been collected. We consider postoperative pain as a value ≥5 on the Visual Analogue Scale, seroma types III and IV of the Morales-Conde classification. Results 32 patients were operated with laparoscopic closure of the defect (LCD) between 2018 and 2020. The mean age was 59 years and body mass index was 31 kg / m2. 14 patients had incisional hernia. 90% of the cases were M2-3 with a mean defect diameter of 2.7 cm. In 5 cases, a preperitoneal mesh was placed without takers, the mean size of the mesh was 15 cm. The mean duration of the procedures was 96.1 min. Seven (22%) patients presented postoperative pain, of which 5 had 24 h limited and in two cases it lasted up to 48 h. No patient presented pain at the 30-day evaluation. The mean length of stay was 1.8 days. The mean follow-up was 23 months, one seroma (3.1%) and three (9.4%) recurrences were diagnosed. Conclusions In our initial experience, we considered LCD a safe technique with benefits for selected patients.

P122 LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH TO THE ABDOMINAL WALL WITH CLOSURE OF THE DEFECT, OUR INITIAL RESULTS