English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim To analyze device safety and clinical outcomes of ventral hernia repair with a hybrid composite mesh Material and Methods This retrospective, multicenter, case review analyzed device/procedure endpoints and patient-reported outcomes in patients treated for hernia repair ≥ 1 year from study enrollment. Results There were 459 patients with 469 ventral hernias with a mean age of 58 ±15 years and 77% Ventral Hernia Working Group 2 (VHWG2). Mean hernia size was 18.9 cm2. Laparoscopic or robotic approach were utilized in 95% of patients, incisional hernias accounted for 57%. Mesh location was 75% intraperitoneal and bridging repair was performed in 57%. Procedure related adverse events within 30-days occurred in 5%, including: surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), ileus, readmission, and re-operation. Procedure-related SSI or SSO events were 3.75% through 12-months. SSO events requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) were 2.57% through 24-months. An estimated 7% of subjects had hernia recurrence through the study with a mean follow-up of 32-months (14-53 months) using a patient-reported outcome measure. Subgroup comparison of fixation type (permanent vs absorbable, p = 0.93) and repair (bridging vs reinforcement, p = 0.99) were conducted for recurrence and were not statistically significant. Conclusions In this analysis, ventral hernia repair with hybrid, composite mesh results in successful outcomes in the majority of patients. This study represents a heterogeneous patient population undergoing repair using various approaches, mesh fixation, and mesh placement locations. These data appear to confirm long-term acceptable safety and device performance with a low rate of recurrence in a predominantly VHWG2 population.

P090 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES FOLLOWING HYBRID BIOMATERIAL REPAIR OF VENTRAL HERNIAS: A MULTICENTER, RETROSPECTIVE STUDY