English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study aimed to look into the short and long-term outcomes in Mycotic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (MAAA) managed by Conventional Surgery (CS) and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Method Data of 17 patients who underwent CS or EVAR for MAAA from 2001 to 2017 in a single centre were collected. Complications and mortality at 3 years post-procedure were also analysed. Results Mean age was 66 (54 - 82 years), 15 (88.2%) were males. Mean aortic anterior-posterior diameter was 5.8cm (2.1 – 9.0 cm). 10 patients (58.8%) presented with rupture. 6 (35%) patients demonstrated positive cultures. 4 patients (23.5%) underwent CS and 13 (76.5) had EVAR of which 4 were surgeon modified EVARs. 5 (29%) patients developed complication within 30 days. 4 patients (23.5%) developed graft infection in long term. Total mortality was 5 (29.4%) of which one patient died within 30 days and two within 3 years of procedure. Long-term mortality was found to be significantly higher in patients treated with CS compared to EVAR (p-value 0.022). Conclusions CS for MAAA has a high mortality rate compared to EVAR. EVAR might be a simple and good alternative for this critical condition in centres with adequate expertise.

742 Conventional Surgery vs Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Management of Mycotic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms