English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The power variance function distributions, which include the gamma and compound Poisson (CP) distributions among others, are commonly used in frailty models for family data. In a previous paper, we presented a frailty model constructed by randomizing the scale parameter in a CP distribution. When combined with a parametric baseline hazard, this yields a model with heterogeneity on both the individual and the family level and a subgroup with zero frailty, corresponding to people not experiencing the event. In this paper, we discuss covariates in the model. Depending on where the covariates are inserted in the model, one may have proportional hazards at the individual level, the family level, and a larger group level (for covariates shared by many families, e.g. ethnic groups) or get accelerated failure times. Each of these alternatives gives a specific interpretation of the covariate effects. An application to data infant mortality in siblings from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway is included. We compare the results for some of the different covariate modeling options.

Regression models for infant mortality data in Norwegian siblings, using a compound Poisson frailty distribution with random scale