English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  Capsular contracture (CC) has remained an unresolved issue throughout history. Strong evidence focuses on bacterial biofilm as its main source. A literature review revealed that more than 90% of bacteria found in capsules and implants removed from patients with Baker grade III-IV CC belong to the resident skin microbiome (Staphylococcus epidermidis, predominant microorganism). The use of an adequate preoperative skin antiseptic may be a critical step to minimize implant contamination and help prevent biofilm-related CC.    Objectives  The authors sought to compare the effect of 2 different antiseptic skin preparations: povidone-iodine (PVP-I) vs chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) on CC proportions after primary breast augmentation through a periareolar approach.    Methods  In June of 2014, The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America proposed to use CHG for preoperative skin preparation in the absence of alcohol-containing antiseptic agents as strategy to prevent surgical site infection. The clinical safety committee of a surgical center in Colombia decided to change PVP-I to CHG for surgical site preparation thereafter. The medical records of 63 patients who underwent to primary breast augmentation through a periareolar approach during 2014 were reviewed. In the first 6 months PVP-I was used in 32 patients, and later CHG was employed in 31 patients.    Results  Pearson’s chi-squared test to compare CC proportions between subgroups showed a statistically significant difference. The CC proportion was higher for patients who had antisepsis with PVP-I. CC was absent when CHG was employed.    Conclusions  CHG as preoperative skin antiseptic for primary breast augmentation surgery was more effective than PVP-I to help prevent biofilm-related CC.    Level of Evidence: 3

Back to Basics: Could the Preoperative Skin Antiseptic Agent Help Prevent Biofilm-Related Capsular Contracture?