English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Unfortunately, I could not really get enthused by this paper1 because it really states the obvious—that interobserver errors in breast surface measurements exist, but there are less observer errors in static measurements than so-called dynamic measurements, despite prestudy investigator training on standard assessment and usage of a caliper and measuring tape. In women with small breasts, this may perhaps be more surprising, and there are obviously inherent inaccuracies to consider, especially if measuring with a caliper over a concave or convex surface in which the true upper pole or lower pole may be difficult to elicit and be affected by the positioning or height of the observer. If the tape is used primarily, the measurement is subjective and will vary on contact pressure; the translation of a caliper distance to a measuring tape should show no error of course. …

Commentary on: The Reliability of Anthropometric Measurements Used Preoperatively in Aesthetic Breast Surgery