English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Efficacy of seed treatments was evaluated against TT injury and for affect on plant stand in Virginia-type peanut in Suffolk, VA. Peanuts were planted 7 May with 36- inch row spacing. Vitavax PC was applied to all treatments, but at different rates. Gaucho and certain Orthene treatments (designated by *) were applied commercially by Gustafson, Inc., Piano, TX. Other treatments (designated by **) were applied commercially by Severn Peanut Co., Severn, NC. With ‘preblend’ treatments, Vitavax and insecticides were preblended at designated rates before application to seed. With ‘overtreat’ treatments, Vitavax was applied to seed at the designated rate, then the insecticide was applied. A ‘hopper box’ treatment was included with product and seed layered and gently mixed in the planter box just before planting. Aldicarb (Temik 15G) was applied to 1 treatment into the seed furrow (IF) at planting as a standard for comparison. A RCBD was used with 4 replicates; plots were 4 rows × 40 ft. Treatments were evaluated by determining plant injury based on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = no TT injured leaves and 10 = 100 percent leaves injured. Plant stand counts were made 17 and 27 d after planting. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and LSD procedures.

Selected Seed and In-Furrow Treatments for Control of Tobacco Thrips in Peanut, 1993