English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND Oscillometric blood pressure (BP) devices are typically labeled for use up to 40 °C. Many geographic regions have ambient temperatures exceeding 40 °C. We assessed the effect of increased ambient temperature (40–55 °C) on simulator-derived oscillometric BP measurement. METHODS Three Omron BP769CAN devices, 3 A&amp;D Medical UA-651BLE devices, and accompanying cuffs were used. A custom heat chamber heated each device to the specified temperature. A noninvasive BP simulator was used to take 3 measurements with each device at differing temperatures (22, 40, 45, 50, and 55 °C) and BP thresholds: 80/50, 100/60, 120/80, 140/90, 160/110, and 180/130 mm Hg. Using each device as its own control (22 °C), we determined the relative differences in mean BP for each device at each temperature and BP setting, assessed graphical trends with increasing temperature, and examined variability. RESULTS Graphical trends of mean simulator-subtracted BP differences from room temperature showed no discernable pattern, with differences clustered around zero. Overall mean difference in BP (combined elevated temperatures minus room temperature) was −0.8 ± 2.1 (systolic ± SD)/1.2 ± 3.5 (diastolic ± SD) mm Hg for the A&amp;D device and 0.2 ± 0.4 (systolic ± SD)/−0.1 ± 0.1 (diastolic ± SD) mm Hg for the Omron. All individual elevated temperature differences (elevated temperature minus room temperature) except A&amp;D diastolic BP at 50 °C were within 5 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS In this simulator-based study assessing within-device differences, higher ambient temperatures resulted in oscillometric BP measurements that were comparable to those performed at room temperature.

Effect of Elevated Ambient Temperature on Simulator-Derived Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurement