English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

/Objective In females of child-bearing years, establishing accurate D-antigen identification is critical; this can be further complicated when a D+ patient seemingly develops an allo-anti-D. We present a unique case series highlighting the critical role of genotyping in distinguishing allo-anti-D vs. auto-anti-D. Methods/Case Report Case 1: An African American, 21-year-old, nulliparous female with a history of sickle cell disease presented for transfusion. The patient’s blood type was O, Rh Positive on multiple testing platforms (ORTHO VISION® Analyzer, 1001 US Highway 202, Raritan, NJ 08869, and Immucor, Inc., 3130 Gateway Drive, Norcross, GA 30071). On type and screen performed by manual tube testing, anti-D was identified. DAT IgG was weakly positive. The patient’s phenotype had been performed previously, and she was negative for both the C and E antigens. Genotyping results: RhD homozygote. RHD*DAU0 and RHD*DIVa type 3. The patient was determined to have auto-anti-D formation. Case 2 A 42-year-old female presented for routine prenatal care. At a previous facility, the patient tested as D+ and typed as O, Rh Positive (ORTHO VISION® Analyzer). An anti-D pattern was identified. Due to the patient’s Rh+ history and early pregnancy status, no Rh immune globulin was administered. A sample was sent to the reference laboratory which confirmed D+ status and a pattern of anti-D. The current titer was 8. Genotyping results RhD hemizyote. Positive for hybrid Rhesus box associated with deletion of RhD and RHD*DIVa, Go(a+). The patient was determined to have an allo-anti-D. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) NA Conclusion These two cases highlight the importance of RhD genotyping for resolutions of anti-D. In case 1, the patient had two altered alleles. While DIVa, type 3, is associated with anti-D formation, she also expressed RhD*DAU0 which is not considered to lack D proteins. We report the rare association between DAU0 expression and auto-anti-D formation.

Allo-Anti-D vs. Auto-Anti-D in Females of Child Bearing Years: The Critical Role of Rh Genotyping