English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

/Objective In this 2020 survey, the co-investigators of this study explored the experiences of medical laboratory professionals (MLPs) and their perceptions of the testing needs of clinical laboratories in the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The responses gathered in this survey highlighted changes in the laboratory workforce and the impact on laboratory operations moving forward. Methods/Case Report This cross-sectional, anonymous, web-based survey of MLPs was conducted between April 29, 2020, and May 31, 2020. To recruit participants, ‘invitation to participate’ messages were posted using online forums and social media platforms (i.e. LinkedIn, Twitter). Furthermore, the survey link was shared with professional contacts and laboratory professional groups. The main source of recruitment was the membership of the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science (ASCLS), which had more than 6,800 active members at the time of the study. Data provided from individuals who provided informed consent was included in the sample. The inclusion criteria for the survey were that participants self-identify as a current employee of a clinical laboratory whose usual employment involved participating in the diagnostic testing and providing of clinical laboratory test results using human specimens. The instrument gathered demographic data about participants and their workplace using 32 closed-ended questions with 8 questions containing branching that allowed for optional open-ended responses. This project was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Kansas Medical Center. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Notably, there was an overall decrease in clinical laboratory testing and overtime work for laboratorians during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents noted a lack of pay increase during the pandemic; however, some received in-kind gifts and messages of support in recognition of their essential work. MLPs reported better (or unchanged) job satisfaction and morale in their respective workplaces. Conclusion The response to the testing needs by healthcare facilities and clinical laboratory leadership can influence the job satisfaction of MLPs, perceptions toward their work, and overall morale during the initial phase of the pandemic. Additionally, cost-reducing measures further shaped the perceptions of MLPs while impacting the operational efficiency of clinical laboratories.

Initial Clinical Laboratory Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Lookback at a Survey of Medical Laboratory Professionals