z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Comparison of ThinPrep and Conventional Smears
Author(s) -
Yvan C. Bédard,
Aaron Pollett
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
american journal of clinical pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.859
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1943-7722
pISSN - 0002-9173
DOI - 10.1093/ajcp/111.4.523
Subject(s) - medicine , fine needle aspiration , predictive value , breast cancer , biopsy , significant difference , cytology , population , radiology , gynecology , nuclear medicine , cancer , pathology , environmental health
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the breast has been used in our institution since 1969. In August 1993, ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp, Boxbotough, MA) processing of breast FNA biopsy specimens was introduced. Comparing conventionally prepared breast FNA specimens (21,193 cases) with ThinPrep processed material (7,903 cases) shows a decrease in the unsatisfactory rate with the ThinPrep processing (29.5% to 27.7%) with no significant change in sensitivity (84.4% vs 86.3%) or positive predictive value (96.5 vs 95.0%). However, there is a slight decrease in specificity (98.6% vs 96.5%) and negative predictive value (91.1% vs 88.0%) with the ThinPrep specimens. The results span 28 years, during which time the breast cancer population has changed, with a higher prevalence of malignancy in the last decade of our study. When the 4 most recent years of conventional cytology are compared with the 4 years of ThinPrep processing, there is no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy. The results of the present study show that the ThinPrep processing technique provides an effective method for preparing breast FNA. specimens.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom