English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. At the Seattle Conference, 1963, M. G. Barratt asked the question, "Can anything general be said about J: wk(SOn) -+7rk+n(Sn) on Samelson products?" Lashof records [4] that Stasheff pointed out an answer to this question on the basis of results obtained by B. Steer in his Oxford thesis [8]. We offer here another answer, phrased in quite different terms, which is simple in both statement and proof. Let p: On+l--S" be the usual bundle map with fiber On; in [5] we define the "p-product": xr(O,) 0r8n,(Sn)-->ir,+8(Sn). The p-product of aEEirq(On) with O3=r8,(Sn) is denoted [a, ]3,. This product generalizes the J homomorphism: if Ln denotes the class of the identity map on Sn then J(a) [a, tn ], [5, Corollary 5.7].

The value of 𝐽 at a Samelson product