English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

where the ai(t) are scalar functions of t, and the operators Xi are independent of t. It is further required that the Lie algebra 2 generated by the Xi under the commutator product [Xi, Xj] = XiXj -XjXi be of finite dimension 1. The above is, of course, always true if A (and U) are finite matrix operators. In 1954, W. Miagnus [4] proved that if X1, X2, , Xi is a basis for ?, then the solution of (1) can be expressed in the form U(t) exp( Ei= gi(t)Xj). This representation of U holds, however, only in a neighborhood of the origin. It has been shown by J. Mariani and W. Magnus [3] that even in the case of 2 X 2 matrices a global version of Magnus' result cannot be obtained without severe restrictions on A (t). We will show that if U is a solution of (1), it can be represented in the form

On global representations of the solutions of linear differential equations as a product of exponentials