English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

IN a previous article,* devoted to a study of conjugate operators, attention was called to the fact that a complete set of conjugate operators which are not all relatively commutative is transformed under the group according to a substitution group which is at most triply transitive. It is easy to prove that this substitution group is at most doubly transitive, and, as the p conjugates of order 2 under the holomorph of the group of the prime order p are transformed under this holomorph according to a doubly transitive group, the substitution group in question can actually be doubly transitive. The most general definition of a complete set of conjugate operators, or conjugate subgroups, of a group G is that the set is composed of the totality of operators, or subgroups, which correspond under one or more of the possible automorphisms of G. It is, however, usually assumed that such a set is composed of the totality of operators, or subgroups, which correspond under at least one of the inner automorphisms of 6?. Since every possible automorphism of any group is an inner automorphism under its holomorph, this difference in the possible definitions of the expression complete set of conjugates does not affect the general theorems relating to such sets. The theorem mentioned in the first paragraph can be materially extended by the consideration of a complete set of conjugate operators involving an operator which is commutative with at least one of the others without being commutative with all of them. When this condition is satisfied the group of transformations of the set is always simply transitive. To prove this let slf s2 represent two commutative operators of

Groups generated by two operators of the same prime order such that the conjugates of one under the powers of the other are commutative