English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

in (8) by means of the well-known maximum-modulus theorem for analytic functions, without resorting to qy . However, since the corresponding result for the speed is often reached without the use of the maximum-modulus theorem, the present proof may seem preferable to some. As a by-product of the proof, a means of evaluating the magnitude of the acceleration at any point in the field of flow is provided by (8), once w(z) is known. Furthermore, since the acceleration is proportional to the gradient of the dynamic pressure, it follows from the present result that the maximum dynamic-pressure gradient in D must occur on its boundary. The boundary of D is, of course, not necessarily a solid boundary. However, for ambiently uniform flows past arbitrarily shaped bodies, the maximum acceleration (or the maximum dynamic-pressure gradient) must occur on one of the solid boundaries. This can be seen by taking D as the entire domain outside the solid bodies. Its boundary then consists of the solid boundaries and a boundary at infinity. Since the acceleration at infinity is zero, the maximum acceleration must occur on one of the solid boundaries.

An estimate of the error due to the truncated boundary in the numerical solution of the Blasius equation