English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the workshop of the July 2016 Building Bridges 3 conference in Sarajevo, I presented the results from a joint article with W. Raji (Mathematische Annalen 2017, preprint arXiv:1402.1854). That article gave a proof of various linear relations between products of two Eisenstein series on $\Gamma(N)$, including an interesting identity related to the action of a Hecke operator on such a product. The real proofs involve some care to deal with issues of convergence. In this note we give "fake" proofs for these identities, ignoring the convergence issues; some of these fake proofs appeared in the workshop lecture as an amusing side note before I sketched the real proofs. Something in these fake proofs is quite suggestive, even though the proofs themselves are clearly invalid (and even produce wrong results). It would be interesting to understand what exactly is going on here.

Fake proofs for identities involving products of Eisenstein series