English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries, by definition, exceed the endogenous repair capacity of skeletal muscle resulting in permanent structural and functional deficits. VML injuries present a significant burden for both civilian and military medicine. Despite progress, there is still considerable room for therapeutic improvement. In this regard, tissue-engineered constructs show promise for VML repair, as they provide an opportunity to introduce both scaffolding and cellular components. We have pioneered the development of a tissue-engineered muscle repair (TEMR) technology created by seeding muscle progenitor cells onto a porcine-derived bladder acellular matrix followed by cyclic stretch preconditioning before implantation. Our work to date has demonstrated significant functional repair (60-90% functional recovery) in progressively larger rodent models of VML injury following TEMR implantation. Notwithstanding this success, TEMR implantation in cylindrically shaped VML injuries in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle was associated with more variable functional outcomes than has been observed in sheet-like muscles such as the latissimus dorsi. In fact, previous observations documented a dichotomy of responses following TEMR implantation in a rodent TA VML injury model; with an ≈61% functional improvement observed in fewer than half (46%) of TEMR-implanted animals at 12 weeks postinjury. This current study builds directly from those observations as we modified the geometry of both the VML injury and the TEMR construct to determine if improved matching of the implanted TEMR construct to the surgically created VML injury resulted in increased functional recovery posttreatment. Following these modifications, we observed a comparable degree of functional improvement in a larger proportion of animals (≈67%) that was durable up to 24 weeks post-TEMR implantation. Moreover, in ≈25% of all TEMR-implanted animals, functional recovery was virtually complete (TEMR max responders), and furthermore, the functional recovery in all 67% of responding animals was accompanied by the presence of native-like muscle properties within the repaired TA muscle, including fiber cross-sectional area, fiber type, vascularization, and innervation. This study emphasizes the importance of tuning the application of tissue engineering technology platforms to the specific requirements of diverse VML injuries to improve functional outcomes. Impact Statement This report confirms and extends previous observations with our implantable tissue-engineered technology platform for repair of volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries. Based on our prior work, we addressed factors hypothesized to be responsible for significant outcome variability following treatment of VML injuries in a rat tibialis anterior model. Through customization of the muscle repair technology to a specific VML injury, we were able to significantly increase the frequency at which functional recovery occurred, and furthermore, demonstrate durability out to 6 months. In addition, the enhanced biomimetic qualities of repaired muscle tissue were associated with the most robust functional outcomes.

Long-Term Evaluation of Functional Outcomes Following Rat Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury and Repair