English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Cryo-electron microscopy (EM) and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) are two different data acquisition modalities often used to glean information about the structure of large biomolecular complexes in their native states. A SAXS experiment is generally considered fast and easy but unveils the structure at very low resolution, whereas a cryo-EM experiment needs more extensive preparation and postacquisition computation to yield a three-dimensional (3D) density map at higher resolution. In certain applications, we may need to verify whether the data acquired in the SAXS and cryo-EM experiments correspond to the same structure (e.g., before reconstructing the 3D density map in EM). In this article, a simple and fast method is proposed to verify the compatibility of the SAXS and EM experimental data. The method is based on averaging the two-dimensional correlation of EM images and the Abel transform of the SAXS data. Orientational preferences are known to exist in cryo-EM experiments, and we also consider these effects on our method. The results are verified on simulations of conformational states of large biomolecular complexes.

Cross-Validation of Data Compatibility Between Small Angle X-ray Scattering and Cryo-Electron Microscopy