English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To precisely predict springback, the stress and strain state has to be described correctly during the forming process and after load removal. In this work, different yield locus descriptions are considered for springback prediction of a CR700Y980T-DP steel with a thickness of 1.5 mm. Experiments and Finite Element Analyses (FEA) with LS-DYNA of a U-bending validation tool were performed and springback predictions compared. In the FEA Hill48, Barlat89 and Barlat's YLD2000 for isotropic hardening, Yoshida-Uemori as a kinematic hardening model and the homogeneous anisotropic hardening (HAH) model are chosen. Monotonic and two-step tensile tests with a directional change of stress are performed and cyclic tension-compression tests are used to determine the material parameters of the investigated hardening models. It is seen that both Yoshida-Uemori and HAH models provide a significant improvement in the springback prediction. The results, however greatly depend on the identification procedure as well as on the modelling of cross-loading contraction effects.

Analysis of yield locus description on springback behaviour of CR700Y980T-DP steel