English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Mathematics relation and function is one of important topics in junior high school. This study aims to see differences in the problem-solving a bilities of junior high school students who use the Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) and conventional models in learning mathematics relation and function. This research is a quantitative study using a quasi-experimental approach with a non-equivalent control group design. The population in this study was all of the seventh-grade students at a State Junior High School in Sungai Penuh, Jambi, Indonesia, and the sample was two groups experimental group and control group. The data collection technique used is a test of mathematical problem-solving skills. The data were analyzed by using he independent t-test to find comparisons or differences. The research result showed that there were differences in the mathematical problem-solving skills of junior high school students who used MEAs and other students who did not use MEAs. This difference occurs as a result of different treatment received by students, by MEAs students are required to be more active in understanding and formulating problems.

Mathematical problem-solving skills on relation and function through Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs)