English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This research has purposes to analyse misconceptions of college students based on feedback of their computational thinking test. This descriptive quantitative research involves fourth semester college students of 4C class of primary school education teacher program by using random sampling. The instruments are test instrument consisting of computational thinking indicators and questionnaires semi structured to identify and analyse of factor causing misconception of the students. The results were then analysed descriptively by using cluster analysis and crosschecked to questionnaire and interview results. The findings show computational thinking of the students was within algorithm stage meanwhile misconception is found in movement system material. The causal reasons of the misconception are grouped into 3 clusters. Cluster 1, the students have already understood the concept but their misconception is 33.3%. Cluster 2, misconception of the students is 38.1%. Cluster 3, the students have not understood the concept with percentage 28.6%. The contributing factors to misconception are students’ arguments that animals/plants have similar natures to human, handbook, lecturer’s explanation, scientific name, mathematics calculation, formula, graphic understanding, influences of peer in answering, and students’ experiences in daily life.

Misconception Analysis Based on Feedback of Computational Thinking Result of College Students