English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Argumentation plays an important role to build and develop students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking skill. Factually, argumentation at secondary school is less scientific because of the lack of scientific discussion content. Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) is a solution because it offers direct observation and comprising experiments at laboratory. It also shapes students’ conception like a scientist. The research aims to implement SWH on environmental pollution learning and observe its effect on students’ argumentation skill. It applied quasi experiment method with 36 7TH grade students as a research subject. The result showed that students’ argumentation contain claim, and warrant. It means SWH plays important role to build and increase students’ argumentation on environmental pollution.

Does science writing heuristic increase secondary school students’ argumentation skills?