English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recently, in a series of works by Liu and Li (L&L), they claimed that thereexists a timing asynchrony of $-25.6\,$ms between the spacecraft attitude andradiometer output timestamps in the original raw WMAP time-ordered data (TOD).L&L reprocessed the WMAP data while the aforementioned timing asynchrony hasbeen corrected, and they obtained an alternative CMB map in which thequadrupole dropped to nearly zero. In the present work, we try to see theimplications to dark energy cosmology if L&L are right. While L&L claimed thatthere is a bug in the WMAP pipeline which leads to significantly differentcosmological parameters, an interesting question naturally arises, namely, howrobust is the current dark energy cosmology with respect to systematic errorsand bugs? So, in this work, we adopt the alternative CMB data of L&L as astrawman to study the robustness of dark energy predictions.

Dark Energy Cosmology with the Alternative Cosmic Microwave Background Data