English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Chiral superfields have been used, and extensively, almost ever sincesupersymmetry has been discovered. Complex linear superfields afford analternate representation of matter, but are widely misbelieved to be'physically equivalent' to chiral ones. We prove the opposite is true.Curiously, this re-enables a previously thwarted interpretation of thelow-energy (super)field limit of superstrings.Comment: 4 pages, plain TeX (needs "harvmac"); 2 references added, typos  correcte

Linear and chiral superfields are usefully inequivalent