English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Contemporary theologians have discussed a wide range of theories of religious pluralism, including John Hick’s well-known quasi-Kantian theory, David Ray Griffin’s Whiteheadian theory, Paul Knitter’s soteriocentric theory, and S. Mark Heim’s “multiple salvations” theory. However, Sri Ramakrishna’s pioneering teachings on religious pluralism have been largely ignored. The Bengali mystic Sri Ramakrishna (1836–86) taught the harmony of all religions on the basis of his own richly varied spiritual experiences and his remarkably eclectic religious practices, both Hindu and non-Hindu. As Sri Ramakrishna put it, “With sincerity and earnestness one can realize God through all religions.” Of course, Sri Ramakrishna was a God-intoxicated mystic rather than a philosopher, so he did not present a systematic theory of religious pluralism. Not surprisingly, there has been a great deal of interpretive controversy regarding precisely how Sri Ramakrishna harmonized the various religions and spiritual philosophies. Three interpretations of his views on religious pluralism are especially prevalent. Frank Morales and Stephen Prothero, among others, have attributed to Sri Ramakrishna the view that

the journal of religion

“God Is Infinite, and the Paths to God Are Infinite”: A Reconstruction and Defense of Sri Ramakrishna’s <i>Vijñāna</i>-Based Model of Religious Pluralism

“God Is Infinite, and the Paths to God Are Infinite”: A Reconstruction and Defense of Sri Ramakrishna’s Vijñāna-Based Model of Religious Pluralism