English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

During the eighteenth century, an interesting debate emerged in Spain regarding\udthe advantages and disadvantages of informing the people or keeping them ig-\udnorant of the affairs of state, as well as the question\ud—\udif choosing the former op-\udtion\ud—\udof whether to tell them the truth or manipulate them with lies. Although\udwe may consider this to be a moral or philanthropic concern within the general\udcontext of the Enlightenment, for the absolute monarchs and the writers sym-\udpathetic to them the issue was primarily a question of state. What was the most\udeffective means to govern

“Is it useful to deceive the people?” The Debate on Public Information in Spain at the End of the Ancien Régime (1780–1808)