English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The death in 1612 of the Lord Treasurer, Robert Cecil, earl of Salisbury, prompted a cultural phenomenon that few observers of state affairs could have failed to notice. As the days passed, libelous verses on Cecil began to proliferate and circulate in unprecedented numbers.' The anxiety surrounding this wave of textual production is evident in the letters of John Chamberlain, who wrote that "the memorie of the late Lord Treasurer growes dayly worse and worse and more libells come as yt were continually."2 Writing just three weeks later, however, John Donne provided a different view. He suggested, perhaps with a touch of irony, that many of the libels were so bad that they might have been written by Cecil's friends:

The Literary Culture of Early Stuart Libeling