English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A nergy is a cellular state in which a lymphocyte is ahve but fails to display certain functional responses when optimally stimulated through both its antigen-specific receptor and any other receptors that are normally required for full activation. The term was initially used by Nossal and Pike (1) to describe an unresponsive state induced by the injection o f soluble protein antigens in vivo, in which the antigen-specific B cells were still found to be present in the animal, but these cells could not be reactivated by antigen or mitogen to make Ig. The first observation of proliferative unresponsiveness induced in purified T cells using peptide antigens was made on human CD4 + clones (2). The results were initially interpreted as a direct inactivation of the T cells through recognition o f free antigen; however, subsequent blocking studies with anti-Ia antibodies revealed the involvement of M H C class II molecules (expressed on the T cells; 3). Downregulat ion o f T cell antigen receptor expression was noted after the stimulation and postulated to be the molecular mechanism for the blocking of reactivation (4). Studies with mouse CD4 § T cell clones uncovered other ways of inducing an unresponsive state, which at first appeared to be similar to the nonprohferating state seen with human T cell clones (5, 6). Presentation o f peptide antigens either on chemically fixed APCs (5) or in planar lipid membranes containing only M H C class II molecules (6) was successful, as was stimulation of highly purified T cells with either concanavalin A (7) or ant i -CD3 antibodies coated on a plastic surface (8). These results suggested that occupancy of the T cell antigen receptor alone, in the absence o f other signals, was responsible for inducing the unresponsive state. P roof for this came from so called "allogeneic add-back" experiments in which live APCs bearing allogeneic M H C class II molecules were used to reconstitute the ability to stimulate a prohferative response and prevent the induction of unresponsiveness, even though the allogeneic cells themselves could not present the antigen to the T cell clone (9). The allogeneic APCs were postulated to be delivering a costimulatory signal(s) needed for both effects. W h e n similar allogeneic add-back experiments were carried out with purified human T cell clones inactivated by exposure to high concentrations of soluble peptides, addition o f either allogeneic or syngeneic APC failed to prevent the induction of the unresponsiveness (10). This puzzling observation was further compounded when other laboratories were able to set up mixed leukocyte responses (ML1Ks) using transfected human cell lines as APCs (11) and essentially reproduce as well as extend the earlier findings made in the murine systems (12). Finally, the recent discovery o f partial peptide agonist ligands has led to a new mouse model for anergy in which these peptides were used to induce an unresponsive state, even in the presence o f costimulation (13). The goal o f this commentary is to sort through these various models o f anergy to try and find some c o m m o n underlying molecular mechanism(s) and then to apply these thoughts to the new work of Groux et al. (in this issue). This study adds yet another twist to the induction process, the cytokine IL-10, which with TC1K occupancy produces an anergic state in freshly isolated human CD4 + T ceils that appears to be more profound than any of the previous in vitro models.

Models of T cell anergy: is there a common molecular mechanism?