English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We investigated the influence of the macromolecular form of an epitope on the structure of antibody variable and constant regions expressed by the B cell population participating in an immune response to that epitope. Hybridomas were constructed from strain A/J mice undergoing either primary or secondary immune responses to p-azophenylarsonate conjugated to Brucella abortus (Ars-Bruc). We determined the sequences of the V genes expressed by hybridomas selected on the basis of expression of a single VH gene segment known to encode a large family of anti-Ars antibodies. These sequences were compared with the sequences of V genes expressed by a previously characterized panel of hybridomas isolated in the same way during the primary and secondary responses of A/J mice to Ars-KLH. The repertoire of Ars-specific V domains expressed among primary and secondary hybridomas elicited with these two forms of Ars were similar, as were the differences between primary and secondary V region somatic mutational alteration and affinity for Ars. In contrast, predominant expression of IgG2 anti-Ars antibodies was elicited in the secondary Ars-Bruc response, whereas secondary anti-Ars antibodies elicited with Ars-KLH are predominantly IgG1. Thus, differences in the macromolecular form of Ars clearly influence the isotypic profile of the anti-Ars response, but the expression, diversification, and selection of V domains elicited with this hapten are not greatly affected by such differences. Our results suggest that while isotype regulation is highly perceptive of the macromolecular form of a B cell epitope, V region regulation is primarily influenced by the molecular structure of that epitope.

Influence of the macromolecular form of a B cell epitope on the expression of antibody variable and constant region structure.